Gore confirms VP is part of executive branch.

In June, House investigators learned that Vice President Cheney exempted his office from a presidential executive order, arguing that the Office of the Vice President is not an “entity within the executive branch.” In a recent interview with Harvard’s alumni magazine, former Vice President Al Gore confirmed that the Vice President is indeed part of the executive:


You were often referred to as the most powerful vice president.


GORE: That was before Dick Cheney.


Point taken. Cheney has made the argument that the vice presidency is not part of the executive branch. Is he right?


GORE: (Laughs) Of course the vice presidency is part of the executive branch! But I fear that I’m losing my objectivity where President Bush and Cheney are concerned. Not much surprises me anymore. I have a lot of friends who share the following problem with me: Our sense of outrage is so saturated that when a new outrage occurs, we have to download some existing outrage into an external hard drive in order to make room for a new outrage.

(Via Think Progress.)

A boring rant

In the interest of keeping items brief I've cut the previous post and put the boring stuff here. Enjoy. Or don't enjoy, as the case may be. Skip over it. Whatever.

It's not just Disney and ABC that are out of touch. Look at the management team at NBC Universal. Look at the GE board of directors. Do these people scare the living shit out of you? They sure scare the hell out of me. They're all buffed and polished and about a hundred and fourteen years old. They look like cadavers who've been done up by the world's best funeral home makeup artist. A lot of them are just GE lifers who did time in plastics and then airplane engines and then somehow got dropped into the TV group.

Here's what I tell them. Friends, you run a television network. Now let's think about this. What the fuck is a television network? It's a system of affiliates designed to help carry a broadcast signal across the wide continent of America on airwaves and into television sets owned by millions of people. In essence, you are in the distribution business. In the second half of the twentieth century you had the great good fortune to be granted a kind of limited monopoly over the distribution of a very valuable commodity. There were only so many airwaves, hence only so many networks. There were way more advertisers than there were channels to carry their advertising. So you sat there with your choke-hold on the garden hose, controlling the flow of programming and getting fatter and fatter and fatter.

It was a wonderful system. For you anyway. Except that it had one huge flaw. Which is that for you guys, the middlemen, to get rich, you needed to fuck over the people at both ends of the value chain -- the consumers who had no choice in what they watched and spent years being fed mountains of dog shit, and the producers of content who were at your mercy and had to negotiate with this tiny number of networks who operated, let's be honest here, as a kind of cartel.

It's over now. Your business model was a historical anomaly built on scarcity of a valuable resource and the willingness of a small group of network operators to not slit each other's throats and to collaborate in exploiting the content producers. Sort of like the Five Families in New York. Wars are bad for business.

You know what the new network is? It's me. I don't think people have quite figured this out yet, but just as Pixar was once a medical imaging company until I decided to make it into something completely different -- ie, the most important entertainment company of the 21st century -- so Apple is not really a computer company anymore, or even a consumer electronics company. We're a network. We take content and distribute it out to millions of people, who play it on handhelds (sold by me) and computer screens (ditto) and yes, maybe, sometimes, on actual TV sets. At one end of the value chain, the consumer end, people have already voted. They like my system better than yours.

At the other end it's trickier. We don't deal directly with the content producers. Instead, we have to deal with these network gatekeepers. But why? What value are they adding? As far as I can see the only thing the networks add is an extra step and a big scoop off the margin.

The producers of content don't like the TV network system but can't quite see the way across the divide into my digital world. Some musical artists, like Prince, are figuring it out, but they're isolated examples. Trust me, however, when I tell you that TV and movie people will figure it out too. These are not stupid people. And they are not un-greedy. Which means their desire for more money and more control and more freedom will lead them to apply their energy into figuring out how to get out of the plantation the TV networks have created for them. They will break free. Mark my words.

The talented ones will go first. Bad news for you, TV networks. You'll be stuck with the shittiest creators, the timid ones who don't dare cross the chasm. Your shows will get worse and worse. Your sitcoms will grow lamer, if that's possible. Your reality shows will grow stupider.

What's left? You've already gutted your news divisions, which was a truly moronic move since that was the only place where you really could continue to add value. Your news shows will continue to devolve into not-really-news Fox-style argument shows where retarded bullies like Bill O'Reilly come on the air and shout at people because some gangsta rapper has a deal with Pepsi, or argue with straw men about whether we should put more troops into Iraq. Where once we had Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite, we'll instead have John Gibson and Sean Hannity ranting about patriotism and calling people names. All heat, no light. Well done, TV networks. When you finally die, the world will celebrate. Because you'll deserve it. Totally.

For now, when these bastards come threatening me and demanding that I join them in fucking over consumers and also allow them to grab a bigger slice of the pie, my standard response remains this: Siooma, ass-munchers. Siooma.

(Via The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs.)

Apple rumor-roundup for September 5th event

Filed under: ,



Check your pulse Apple fanatics, "the beat goes on" September 5th... now just two days away. Unusual for Apple rumors, this event has pretty much all the analysts and so-called insiders in sync with their predictions. Mass disillusion or divine soothsaying, we don't know. Certainly everyone's been expecting this to be a big quarter for product transitions. While we wait, we figured you might as well get up to speed on all the predictions for Wednesday's big show:

While not necessarily rumored for Wednesday, there's always a chance that we'll hear a bit more about Apple's automotive collaborations with Volkswagen and Jaguar. Just sayin's all.

(Via Engadget.)

What Did Apple’s Five Fingers Say to NBC’s Face? SLAP!

chappelle1.jpg


Apple just slapped NBC down hard. Responding to reports NBC was pulling out of the iTunes Store, Apple announced that it was prematurely canceling their partnership — Because NBC wanted $5 per episode of its shows!


Apple® today announced that it will not be selling NBC television shows for the upcoming television season on its online iTunes® Store (www.itunes.com). The move follows NBC’s decision to not renew its agreement with iTunes after Apple declined to pay more than double the wholesale price for each NBC TV episode, which would have resulted in the retail price to consumers increasing to $4.99 per episode from the current $1.99. ABC, CBS, FOX and The CW, along with more than 50 cable networks, are signed up to sell TV shows from their upcoming season on iTunes at $1.99 per episode.


Incredible. NBC has benefited from iTunes more than anyone else, and they’re throwing out crazy price increases. I mean, that would have made Friday Night Lights Season 1 cost $110! NBC is selling the DVD for less than $20 brand-new with more special features! If this is any indication of Hulu’s pricing scheme, it’s screwed out of the gate.


Via Daring Fireball.


Rick James pic from CBC.

(Via Cult of Mac.)

Analysis: defense of Miss Teen South Carolina and Maps and Such as


Regarding the ongoing internet fun-poking at Miss Teen South Carolina and her love of maps, Jason Schultz says,

In response to the recent call to action by Miss Teen South Carolina, Maps For
Us started a blog of important maps: Link. My favorite is the map of Sparta: Link.

In BoingBoing's comment section, reader Tim Howland shared this revelation:

I think that everyone has missed something important here; she's actually been pioneering a new art form- a combination of Hindi Ghazal poetry and blank verse.

Look at the transcription:

I personally believe that us americans

are unable to do so
because osama.

People out there

in our nation

don't have that,

And I believe that our education

like such as south africa and

such as the Iraq.

everywhere "such as".

And I believe our education

should help the US

should help the south africa

and the iraq

and the asian countries

so we can build up

our future.

The themes are clear; she's worried about the way we are reacting to the war on terror, the way Osama Bin Laden still is free, and the way that we are being "educated". The irony is simply dripping from the last stanza.

She was able to deliver this call to revolution absolutely deadpan, cunningly pulling the wool over America's eyes- and people here have the temerity to mock her intellectual accomplishments? She is the latter-day heir to Rosa Luxemborg- only, without the boathook.

Previously on BoingBoing:

  • Tube Map for Miss SC: The Iraqs and Everywhere, Like, Such As.

  • Miss South Carolina says we need more maps (video)


    (Via Boing Boing.)

  • Tube Map for Miss SC: The Iraqs and Everywhere, Like, Such As.


    Many BoingBoing readers sent in copies of this lovely Tube Map, composed for Miss South Carolina after her most inspirational speech at a recent beauty pageant about the people of Iraq and Such As. Link to full-size at Morning Toast blog, and better grab a hanky before you watch that video Mark posted earlier. (thanks, Method77, Nev Cornforth, Rick P.)


    (Via Boing Boing.)

    Welcome to the new Boing Boing!

    I'm writing this from Boulder, Colorado, which seems like a good place
    to make this announcement -- it was in this town that Carla Sinclair
    and I launched bOING bOING as a print zine in 1988. During the past 19
    years we've gone through many changes -- from zine to webzine to
    directory to blog. Today, Boing Boing is changing again, in three
    exciting new ways: a redesign, the return of user comments, and a blog
    about personal technology.

    The new look comes from Jemma Hostetler of Studio Sans Nom. Her
    redesign is cleaner, easier-to-read, and built to incorporate
    additional new features that we'll be adding to Boing Boing in the
    near future. The redesigned logo and new character mascots were
    created by the fun-loving folks at eBoy, a collective of awesomely
    talented pixel-pushing artists from Germany and New York.

    We're also happy to be reintroducing comments to Boing Boing, a
    feature we reluctantly dropped a couple of years ago. At that time, we
    lacked the resources to manage the comments, and felt that a lousy
    comment system was worse than no system at all, so we pulled the plug.
    We've never felt good about it, though, because our readers' comments
    added a great deal of value to the blog. To correct this, we hired a
    terrific community manager to oversee the conversations: Teresa
    Nielsen Hayden. At her own blog, Making Light, Teresa has proven
    herself to be a wonderfully wise and talented tender of online
    conversations. Teresa worked closely with our designers to develop a
    commenting system that supports the Boing Boing community while
    preventing noise from drowning out the signal. "We want this new
    community system to make Boing Boing even more fun and informative,"
    says Teresa. Under her supervision, we're sure it will be.

    Our third major change is the launch of a brand new blog:
    Gadgets.boingboing.net. While Boing Boing has always covered personal
    technology, the four of us (Cory, David, Xeni, and I) believed a
    critical, intelligent, optimistic, and selective blog about personal
    technology and consumer electronics would be a fine addition to Boing
    Boing. But who could we trust to oversee a tech blog that the four of
    us would want to read? Actually, it wasn't hard to find that person.
    We went straight to Joel Johnson, a former Gizmodo editor and founder
    of Dethroner. Joel is smart, funny, knowledgeable, and curious about
    technology. He was our first, and unanimous, choice to run
    Gadgets.boingboing.net. And we're grateful he agreed to come on board.

    We'd like to thank the happy mutants who helped make this major
    relaunch possible. These folks went under the hood and untangled the
    mess that Boing Boing's code had snarled into, and created an elegant, powerful system that positively
    shines. Federated Media's Jonathan Schreiber and Ivan Kanevski did an amazing job of
    dealing with the technical aspects of the redesign. Our beloved system
    administrator Ken Snider worked his magic on the server side and made
    sure all changes to the site wouldn't impact the speed of page reloads or clobber us with high bandwidth costs. David Jacobs at Apperceptive upgraded Boing Boing to the newest
    edition of Movable Type, and designed and implemented the new comment system
    to Teresa's specs.

    Special thanks go out to the gang at Federated Media: John Battelle,
    Chas Edwards, Josh Matison and everyone else that
    contributed a significant amount of time and hi-octane mental effort
    on making this relaunch a success. We're grateful to all of you for
    everything you've done. Extra special thanks to FM's Jason Weisberger for
    endless advice, encouragement, and, well, adult supervision.
    Thank you!

    We hope you enjoy the new Boing Boing. Let us know what you think by
    clicking on the "discuss" link and adding your thoughts.


    (Via Boing Boing.)

    It’s on: Apple event slated for September 5th

    Filed under:



    Well the rumors have been floating around for a few days, and now we've gotten official word -- in the form of the invite you see above -- that Apple will be holding a "special event" on September 5th. Let the speculation begin!

    ]

    (Via Engadget.)